“We often see what we don’t know and we know what we don’t see»
G. Frying pan.
1. What underlies the definition – Bolotov’s school?
In the early nineties, on the initiative and instructions of the Russian Academy, Boris Vasilyevich Bolotov began to rebuild the Kiev-Mohyla Academy, becoming its first president. This organizational work united innovatively thinking scientists and simply talented people around him. The main task of the Academy was the definition and development of science-intensive areas. But the interests and plans of politicians did not coincide with the scientific and ideological development platform, which was formulated by the Academy Board. After a skillfully organized, newspaper persecution, Bolotov abandoned the idea of the formation of the Kiev-Mohyla Academy, in his ideological understanding, and concentrated on scientific work and creating his own laboratory.
There was a group of people around Boris Vasilyevich who accepted his conceptual principles, making them the basis of their future activities. I am one of them. This is what defines the concept – Bolotov’s school.
2. In scientific circles, his views are skeptical. How do you explain this?
When, in the early nineties, Boris Vasilievich argued that any heat release should be considered as a nuclear process, even if it was an animal organism, the scientific community advised him to reread physics textbooks again. But after the Slovak experiment, thinking physicists began to quietly read his book on the structure of matter, remembering that about the same thing in the 60s, Nobel Prize winner Louis Kervran spoke. After all, ten years ago, the decay of iron into two aluminum atoms was perceived as scientific heresy. And today it is already clear that in an electromagnetic field at a certain momentum, this is possible with any element of the periodic table.
3. Why is it not of interest to those who finance the development of science-intensive technologies? And isn’t that the level of a Nobel Prize?
In Ukraine, only applied technologies are financed on the basis of preserved, old scientific productions. No one invests money on the implementation segment between theoretical and applied science. This suggests that there is still no state and national scale next to global science. This is especially true for research requiring huge investments and implementation at the level of research and new, also engineering solutions, with a possible return in a couple of decades. Today, few countries and multinational companies can afford such a luxury. If we take into account that Boris Vasilyevich is over eighty, then it is understandable why he concentrated only on fundamental issues.
And if we talk about the level of the Nobel Prize, then neither Nikola Tesla, who is considered “the man who invented the twentieth century”, nor Tsiolkovsky, who is considered the “father of astronautics”, nor many others, were awarded this prize. But they showed the direction in which to think, and those who accepted it became the laureates of this award.
If you try to consider the sprouts of Bolotov’s understanding of the nature of matter, then they make way in the research of the Japanese physicist Yoshiaki Arata, which is confirmed by an expert assessment at Predju University. And the priorities in science will be set by science itself, and not by the presidents of the Academies.
4. What does all this have to do with medicine?
Engaged in cold nuclear fusion, Boris Vasilyevich Bolotov carefully studied systems where energy is converted into matter at low temperatures and vice versa. In the circle of such phenomena of nature, he closely studied and comprehended the phenomenon of life. After all, there were simple questions at the intersection of physiology and biochemistry, to which no one clearly answered. For example, due to which thermal homeostasis is maintained in various living systems and why temperature sufficiency is precisely one or another numerical indicator. After all, already in the early 80s it was clear that all the biochemical reactions that occur in the organisms of living beings on the basis of food intake cannot give even a tenth of the temperature homeostasis of our body. Or why, for example, a change in the topological configuration of a protein chain affects the processes occurring inside the cell and why the chain length has a specific numerical determinant.
Studying all these phenomena, Bolotov came to the conclusion that cell division, called apoptosis, is only one form of cell transformation. Back in 1993, he argued that a normally developing cell, during division, has parts that differ from each other, one of which must decay to one of the irreplaceable amino acids.noacid, around which a new protein assembly will begin. These amino acids are the material and informational axial basis of the regenerative mechanism of cell formation. Such intracellular pulsation of budding, with a further reset to recreate proteins, largely determines the processes of longevity. Then biochemists considered this nonsense, since the process of division is already in the embryo. But the fact of the matter is that these two processes can be present simultaneously. This is one of the forms of the unity of opposites in the struggle between structure and decay, order and chaos in our body.
Almost no one accepted Bolotov’s theoretical views. I remember one well-known biochemist who, turning purple, indignantly asked “how can this be confirmed if it is impossible to verify?”. But after 15 years, confirmation appeared. In 2008 and 2009, two authoritative scientific publications, where, as a rule, scientific works of possible Nobel Prize winners are published, interesting results of a group of American scientists were published. They found that during cell division, the two parts formed have a different wave response. Moreover, tumor cells do not divide in a hydrolytic environment, but decompose to amino acids. This means that there is a mechanism for shedding cell mass, which has any changes in homeostasis in its structure. Now it is important to understand what kind of violations predetermine such a process. As for hydrolases in our body, this is a kind of necessary acidic environment. This was a confirmation that Boris Vasilyevich had a correct understanding of the processes of cell vital activity. Here you have Bolotov, in a cotton sleeveless jacket, with a biochemical laboratory in his brain.
Niels Bohr was once asked why the atom is arranged the way it is and not some other way. He replied: “I know it.” And all this has the most direct relation to medicine. Bolotov was the first to scientifically explain the phenomenon of life as a determinant in the structure of astrophysical processes in the universe. This means that there is a fulcrum on which the integral skeleton, the new body of medical science, can be assembled.
5. Do you think that something is wrong in medicine?
I believe that medicine develops on the basis of a modern, scientific understanding of life processes. But the axiomatic understanding of these processes is far from complete. If we take any textbook on medicine, then there we will see a lot of streamlined formulations like – from the point of view of today’s understanding, or very specific – the causes of the disease are unknown. This means that the technologies for treating many diseases are based on the concept of them, and not on an accurate understanding of their nature.
For example, and it’s not a secret, the origin of about 40,000 diseases is unknown to medicine today. Plus, about 20,000 more diseases have been recorded, which are called iatrogenic, which arise from the use of medicinal substances. As a result, there are 60,000 questions unknown to medicine next to our health and possible diseases. Aren’t these numbers scary?
That is to say, modern medicine is an empirical guide, where the analysis is mainly based on the statistical result. Today it is called – the effectiveness of the method. To raise the question of whether this is good or bad is wrong, since this is our current level of knowledge about human nature. But the patient is not interested in these marathon races of medical science. He wants to be healthy today.
6. So, where to look for the truth?
There is no need to seek any truth, since civilization has not yet formulated what it is. Reflections about it are present in us in the form of questions, as a result of analysis and dissatisfaction. After all, the Bohr model of the atom is a purely speculative model that allowed the development of a whole rational field of science – nuclear physics. If we think about the principles of scientific choice in medical science, then the need for an integral understanding of living matter, beyond the biochemical line, has long matured. Moreover, thirty years ago, these ideas appeared as an irrational whim around the physical environment. Remember how in the early 80s they shied away from scientists and people who talked about some kind of bioenergetics and chakras in our body. And today, devices see this and equipment has been created to simulate such fields and their effect on our body. Few people today understand what P.P. Goryaev and S.V. Koltsov. But this is the future verdict of the modern pharmaceutical monopoly, if not to thinking. If we talk about people seeking salvation in the pharmaceutical jungle, then for them the truth is where there is a stable and documented result in the treatment of specific diseases, and especially oncological ones. If there is no such result, or it is temporary and is accompanied by optimistic psychotherapy by the attending physician and a superficial TV journalist, then this is not the truth, but a social fake for it.
Therefore, to anyone who is craving objective information beyond illusions, I recommend to delve into the essence of the definition – palliative medicine and look in the medical literature sections – prognosis.
7. But in today’s information world, there are so many offers to demonstrate the truth. How can an unprepared person find exactly what will help him?
Yes, indeed, today’s information space has absorbed both the accentuated saviors of mankind and the crowd of various kinds of children of Lieutenant Schmidt. Their nightingale singing captivates the ear and froths the unprepared mind of those who yearn for a miracle. After all, a person is so arranged that he always succumbs to laziness and habits.
And all sorts of pseudo-energetics, absolute dealers and fear catchers, offer everything right now, without leaving the cash register. If serious illnesses recede, then this happens very slowly and lasts for months, and sometimes even years. And most importantly, it is always built on a multi-vector effect on the body by a whole complex of substances, and not on a panacea in the form of one pill, weed or the advice of a newspaper and a neighbor.
If a person is looking for treatment outside the oncology center, then, as I said above, one should not look for a panacea, but for people who do not just talk about oncological diseases, but are engaged in medical practice with specific positive results that you can check.
8. But only oncology centers have licenses for the right to treat oncological diseases.
I think this is a necessary norm. After all, the number of cancer patients shakes the mind, especially in the future in the coming years. Imagine if they all rush to healers and pseudo psychics. And so there is a common problem for the early detection of cancer. And in this case, it will only be aggravated by the loss of precious time. But if there are experimental programs, or individuals showing good results in treatment outside the protocol norm, then this should be taken as an exception to the rule. Remember how they persecuted Paracelsus and many others like him. But nothing, their science survived.
9. And how can traditional medicine help in the treatment of cancer?
No way! Any traditional medicine, including Tibetan medicine, is powerless against oncology. Using its methods, it is possible to activate the excretory systems and thereby alleviate the general condition of the patient. Using alkaloids, you can slightly slow down the growth of tumors, but you cannot interfere with the formation of cancer cells. Moreover, the use of various decoctions and infusions in the treatment of herbs contributes to the alkalization of our body.
And this contributes to the development of the disease in malignant and benign tumors. These methods can be used for short periods of time to bring the body out of a state of peroxidation. Remember that cancer cells do not divide in the hydrolase environment.
10. It turns out that all oncological diseases, regardless of the stage, should be treated only in oncological clinics?
If we are talking about formations over 20 mm, not to mention massive tumors, then yes, it is more correct to turn to official medicine. After that, alternative methods of treatment can be used, but only those that do not exist in the mouths and texts of the Internet, but represent real cases of a complete cure, where people have been living for 7-10 years. If a person does not find such alternative magicians, then the next step will have to agree to chemo or radiation therapy. With all the shortcomings and severe side effects, this is nevertheless a way out that allows you to extend life, at least by two or five years. And if these are the initial stages, then for longer. But people want a full recovery, not half measures, and therefore they seek salvation anywhere, because they know that they will not be cured in the oncology center. And the total optimization in the media about progress in cancer treatment is just public psychotherapy. Look at the statistics for developed countries. All of them did not solve the problem of mortality, but only solved the problem of early diagnosis. And the only difference is that in clinics in developed countries, you will not be infected with hepatitis or staphylococcus, as is possible in our country. In Germany, the annual growth of cancer is 1.3%, and in the US – 1.24%, with the same percentage of deaths from them. And the statistical length of survival in these developed countries is the same as in undeveloped ones.
Hence the conclusion: Oncological diseases are not a problem of medicine in this or that country, but a scientific problem of understanding their nature. The method of Boris Vasilyevich Bolotov is precisely based on understanding the global causes of oncological diseases.
11. What makes his views so different from modern medical science?
As a nuclear physicist, to understand the realityunderstanding of life, he approached from the position of astrophysical reality, which determined all interactions in animate and inanimate nature as a determinant. This is exactly what was needed in the development of biology, biochemistry and biophysics, to understand the general processes of the relationship between the wave nature and the nature of matter. BV Bolotov believes that the phenomenon of protein life in an oxygen environment is possible only through the processes of photosynthesis and beta synthesis. Since the life of plants and animals is a product of thermoatomic reactions of stars, and these two processes take place in any conditions with the formation of water, oxygen, carbon dioxide and other elements, life on Earth is no exception. On the contrary, plant and animal forms of life permeate the entire universe, since these two processes are the consequent product of the reaction around every luminous star. In our body, both the process of beta synthesis, with the assembly of animal proteins on the carboxyl group, and the process of photosynthesis, with the assembly of plant proteins on the amine group, can occur. Cancer cells in the body of animals and humans are also reproduced during photosynthesis. Only this photosynthesis takes place on ultraviolet, x-ray and gamma rays, which are formed due to the beta synthesis of animal cells. This is the conceptual theory on which the entire medicine of Boris Vasilievich Bolotov is built.
13. So you think that a person can know the Truth?
In terms of how he imagines and formulates it, he can. Even religious literature leaves such an opportunity for a person within the limits of the physical, and not the spiritual body. Bible, Genesis, chapter 3. “22. And the Lord God said: Behold, Adam has become as one of Us, knowing good and evil; and now, no matter how he stretched out his hand, and also took from the tree of life, and tasted, and began to live forever. 23. And the Lord God sent him out of the garden of Eden to till the ground from which he was taken. 24. And he drove out Adam, and placed in the east near the garden of Eden a cherub and a flaming sword turning to guard the way to the tree of life.
As we can see, the main reason for Adam’s expulsion from Paradise, away from the Garden of Eden, is the possible foolishness of knowledge and rational curiosity. Vedas, the monkey does not look at the sky, tormented by the trajectory of Apophis, And the man, not only tormented, but also wants to change it. Hence the conclusion – Man is a potential and an integral part of the truth itself.
14. How do you feel about religion?
I try to be restrained in evaluating religious worldviews in order to reduce the emanations of hostility and rejection. After all, any other point of view is perceived by believers as an encroachment on the promised, possible immortality. If we talk about the institutions of the church, then this is an ideological technology that will always be convenient for those in power and will flourish in a society where money is king. They do not care how and at what liturgy, the society will be built in the phalanx of ideology. Moreover, it doesn’t even matter that the modern flock is more represented by those who ask, and not deeply believers. The main thing is that there should be no doubt that everything related to our life is not decided by an uncle, but only in heaven. How convenient it is for the riders of society. And if suddenly, the society again needs to be returned to paganism, then the politicians will be the first to jump over the fires, and the priests will be reincarnated as priests. Although this is unlikely to happen soon, since today monotheism is a handy toolkit. But seedlings of a future ideology are already being seen, which will most likely be built on the genetic connection of those in power with the inhabitants of other civilizations.
15. Are there any other methods of treating oncological diseases that you have noted for yourself? And do you think they deserve attention?
I will not dwell on the scientific aspects of the effectiveness of the methods of Max Wolf, Emmanuel Revici and Tulio Simoncini and others that require a special discussion. Their achievements in the treatment of cancer are known to all. Amidst the mass of heuristic gibberish that gushes out all over the place, there are a number of interesting ideas and techniques that deserve special attention. For example, I personally am interested in the methods of Professor Borisov V.A. focused on immunity reserves. And despite the fact that he is not inclined to verbally advertise methodological nuances, the general approaches are clear.
The method of DST therapy, which is actively promoted and popularized by Dr. M.V.Kutushov, is also interesting. He believes that the most intimate point of cancer formation has been found.
I am aware of a number of positive results with this method, although there is no full documented publicity. Preliminary results of treatment with this method may well supplement, and in some cases even replace the methods of radiation and chemotherapy. Its conceptual basis is aimed at turning on the response mechanisms, at the distorted reflection of spectral impulses from the celloh membrane. And these are absolutely correct attempts to cope with the malignant process, since the topological changes in intracellular chains make the membrane vulnerable to the wave standards inherent in us by nature. Unfortunately, the use of this method remains a half-measure and does not solve the problem of a non-localized process that occurs throughout the body in oncology. But in any case, this is an important step in the development of medical science.
But in fairness, it should be noted that in recent articles by Kutushov, there is a theoretical orientation that goes beyond this method. Perhaps it’s time to look beyond the fence of biochemical factors.
It also seems interesting to develop a very old idea, which was modernized by the Kyiv scientist Zaviryukha. I know five people who have been treated with his serum and for 3-4 years now they have been doing well. There is something to think about here, given that autoimmune mechanisms are triggered in conditions of an overwhelming toxic load and a changed environment. But as soon as the possibility of allocation of funds for his research program arose, he immediately got into trouble. Apparently, he has no friends and connections among senior officials, and pharmacists from business and envious people do not sleep.
We should also not forget that the American doctor and scientist Emmanuel Revici had amazing results in the treatment of cancer. Unfortunately, if we talk about the scientific heritage of his methods, then this whole well is an iceberg, around which a small group of people crowded, trying to see what is hidden under the water. The most obsessed of them is Kirill Lanskoy, who has been trying to storm this peak for 4-5 years now. But from those nuclear and often correct articles with which he regularly bombards the Internet by changing sites, we can conclude that he sincerely longs to reach a result in the mode, as he himself writes, of reasonable empiricism. I know that Professor M.I. also tried to use Revici’s methods. Litvak (hospice – Israel). But over time, he began to use Revici’s substances, only as an addition to conventional methods of treatment. It is known that a scientific program is being funded in Canada that develops Revici’s ideas very closely. All the others, highlighted next to his name, simply exploit his authority, each with their own motives.
In today’s scientific world, more and more attention is paid to research that is aimed at finding algorithmic models for wave breaking the protein chain in the right places. In 2007 in Japan, they conducted a series of studies on the simultaneous effect on the body of a modified, spectral reflection, through an optically oriented coordinator and a magnetic wave impulse of different frequencies. This is very close to the publications of the Americans, in terms of the difference between the wave response and two parts during cell division. In Russia, this vector was chosen by P.P. Goryaev and S.V. Koltsov. Bolotov always said that the human brain is a biological space machine, and the body, a cold nuclear fusion reactor, where the processes of water decay into hydrogen and oxygen, are the determining factor in life.
And the biochemical guide, under the influence of external and internal factors, will always line up in the right direction, like a constant neutralization reaction. That is why the medicine of the future will be built on the basis of wave balances and only then on the basis of biochemical ones. But to solve this problem, a new branch of genetics has not yet been formulated – biotopology. If we already understand that astrophysical processes have determined the phenomenon of life and develop on the basis of a topological determinant, if all atoms are built on the basis of a series of prime numbers, then why should the protein space be built differently, outside the alphabet of nature, which is a number. After all, all numerical expressions of proteins, together with polypeptide discharge points, are a given quantitative, critical mass. And these are not just numerical expressions, but the fundamental laws of equilibrium. All processes of intracellular transformation begin with topological deformations of the protein chain, when the symmetry of the wave impulse conduction to each amino acid in the chain is broken. First of all, this applies to those amino acids that occupy the reference points in the chain, acting as a retransmitting amplifier of through impulses. Based on just such a mathematical algorithm, protein invariants are assembled for different types of chains.
There is a system of such informational correction in the body, but if it fails at the algorithmic and, as a result, topological level, then genetic disorders begin already at the biochemical level. Non-invasive examination methods allow today only to grope for this distorted impulse, but how to reboot the body systems and individual cells is still the object of scientific dogma.hell. Here it is necessary to mathematize the understanding of the initial parameters, because such a perfect mechanism as our body does not accept transcendental recipes. The physical and mathematical guideline in an attempt to gain new knowledge about the phenomena of biological life has become the starting point for most modern research today.
16. What is the basis of the method you are using?
I have already said that cancer cells, according to Bolotov’s theory, belong to D – isomers of right-hand rotation, which are cells of plant origin and, under conditions of cellular hypoxia, line up on the basis of the amine assembly of proteins, under conditions when intercellular space does not meet the definition – hydrolytic environment. Therefore, the main task of the first stage of treatment is the change and active drainage of the intercellular space. To solve this problem, organic and inorganic substances are used, individually for each patient, as well as a complex of pharmaceutical substances and specially prepared plant substances, to cleanse the body of decay products. At the second stage of treatment, enzymes prepared on the basis of animal and plant material containing alkaloids are supplied to the body. This solves two problems, the permeability of the cell membrane and the chopping of proteins in cancer cells. The second stage of treatment takes place against the background of hyperthermia, since with an acidified environment of the intercellular space, heating causes cellular decay, and with alkalized and alkaline, on the contrary, cell division and active cell growth. In each case, these tasks must be solved individually, since not every organism can be immediately introduced into these modes. In parallel, general therapeutic tasks are being solved, since any treatment of oncological diseases, with any effective substances, always puts a burden on the body. This is a thesis statement of the essence of the method, for a person who does not have special, professional training or the necessary knowledge..
17. It turns out that the method you are using includes not only Bolotov’s recommendations?
Bolotov’s views and recommendations form a conceptual framework, and the content takes into account a number of methods and substances when solving specific problems. Many patients come to me after a full or incomplete course of treatment in cancer centers. And sometimes, in extreme, very rare cases, I send them there myself, explaining the need for such a decision. This is especially true for breast cancer, melanoma, brain tumors and some other tumors that are difficult to resolve, or reverse. If there is a tumor focus that does not leave time for long-term treatment, or a number of disorders in the body that do not allow active exercise, then I always try to reduce the time. It’s always a trade-off between understanding the burden of chemotherapy and the need to give the body time to readjust. After all, the main thing, after any treatment at the oncology center, is to prevent the secondary process of continuing the growth of cancer cells, since this task cannot be solved there.
18. What is the efficiency of this method if there is already a secondary process?
Mostly people come to me when the metastasis is clear and they feel they need to try something else. Sometimes relatives of patients come to whom the oncologist honestly admitted that he does not know what to do next and therefore it is necessary to look for new methods of treatment. But these are extremely rare cases. I take such patients if I understand that there are chances. Unfortunately, not all of them survive, as the body is destroyed by chemotherapy and, as a rule, decay processes. If the patient fails to help, then in most cases their pain subsides and the body lasts longer.
19. How many of these patients survived?
If you count those who applied with the secondary process, then 86 people. This is 2-3 people out of ten, in eleven years. All these cases are documented. Moreover, for control examinations, after my treatment, I send them to oncological clinics, where the diagnosis was made and the first treatment was carried out. If we talk about patients at the first and second stages of the disease, where according to the classification T1-2 N0M0 is established, then almost all of them recover completely. The reason for the failures, as a rule, are severe parallel diseases of the pancreas, liver, kidneys and heart, which do not allow special intensive therapy.
20. Can an ordinary person with no medical training use this method in self-treatment?
In oncological diseases, the use of this method by the patient himself is unlikely to give a final, positive result. There are a lot of symptomatic manifestations and features according to the results of examinations that require special knowledge for correct conclusions about the course of the disease.and the choice of substances that the patient takes. I’m not talking about the fact that uncontrolled oxidation of the body is not at all safe, especially with an increased risk of bleeding. Also, sour press is poorly kept by the kidneys, pancreas, bone and cartilage tissue. In his books, Bolotov warns that the use of his method is possible only under the supervision of a doctor or a specialist who owns his method of treatment. As for other diseases, his recommendations can be used. But it must be remembered that health begins with acid-base balance, and not blunt oxidation or alkalization.
21. Who mostly comes to you for help?
As a rule, these are people without illusions, who understand exactly what awaits a cancer patient after all the courses of treatment at the cancer center. For them, lost time is priceless and therefore they begin to search for alternatives. And rightly so, since cancer cells in the human body begin to build immediately after the completion of a course of chemotherapy. The only problem is that, at best, they end up with good herbalists, who only slow down the process. But most of them are caught in the network of dubious doctors and network companies that stuff them with skillfully composed texts and gold bottle stickers.
22. But after all, a patient is not kicked out of the oncology center into the street.
He is observed, given therapeutic support and more.
Yes, all of this is true and no doubt correct. But I’m talking about something completely different. The problem is not what qualifications an oncologist has and how conscientiously he fulfills his mission. In the end, almost all doctors are at the forefront of methodological guidelines, which makes them highly educated technologists and nothing more. The problem is that science has given them an imperfect methodological apparatus of thinking, beyond which everything is nonsense. There are almost no doctors of innovators and scientists rolled into one, such as Robert Koch, Emmanuel Revich, Max Wolf, Tulio Simoncini, A.S. Samohotsky and the like.
23. Do doctors, famous people, politicians and businessmen contact you?
Doctors sometimes apply, and oncologists are curious, because they know and observe their patients who have been treated by this method. But there is one observation that has been confirmed for many years, which I do not undertake to comment on. In contacts with doctors, zealous rejection of alternative, incomprehensible views and methods of treatment, even if they are effective, is mainly shown by female doctors. Men always try to penetrate and understand, albeit with different conclusions, but always through the analytical mechanism. Such separation is not observed in contacts with biochemists and biophysicists. Apparently, the technological emphasis in the preparation of a doctor, the protocol principle adopted in medicine, forms a taboo for most doctors not only on any doubt on generally accepted recommendations, but also on the desire for alternative searches. Well-known people and businessmen rely only on their wallets, and cry – Europe will help us. But, judging by the TV reports, it doesn’t help yet, and it can’t.
And the political beau monde in general is an interesting people, confident that their brains are able to deal with anything and make the only right decision. They immediately consult with those whom the Minister of Health calls, and try to get to those who have more regalia. It seems to them that their material resources will allow them to purchase especially effective drugs directly from a scientific laboratory, some kind of cool institute. But these tales about super-effective drugs for a lot of money are refuted by time and the names of those who, in their lifetime, could buy a quarter of the world.
Speaking without irony, then financially secure people always focus on the best and most advanced in medicine. But these choices, and their possibilities, only marginally push back the same outcome. Modern medicine has achieved a lot in its development, but where the oncological process is, it is powerless.
24. Who else besides you is engaged in treatment using this method?
B.V. Bolotov has few followers who actively implement his method with positive results. First of all, this is a therapist from Vinnitsa – Dmitry Vlasovich Naumov, who leads his patients very thoughtfully and scrupulously.
There are a few other people who deal with gangrene after frostbite. Among the very small number of popularizers of the ideas of Boris Vasilyevich, I would like to note the publications ZOZH and Peter, who regularly publish something. But there are also groups of people who call themselves students and followers of Bolotov. Some of them actively declare themselves on the Internet, balancing on forums and non-professional publications. Many among them are the so-called children of Lieutenant Schmidt. Quite often people turn to me, driven by their recommendations and thoughtless, tstandard approach to the most extreme states. Perhaps I will present their letters and phone numbers on one of the forums.
I have already said that one should not be shy about asking everyone who takes on oncology for extracts or copies of case histories and phone numbers of those they really helped. This simple rule will put everything in its place.
25. Do you have a special medical education?
When I began to study medicine in self-education in 1996, I was 45 years old and due to my age, I could not apply for admission to medical school. Therefore, I only attended pharmacognosy courses at the Kiev Institute of Traditional Medicine.
But my main teachers were Boris Vasilyevich Bolotov and neurologist, Professor Alexander Romanovich Vinnitsky. They guided me for 10 years. Everything else was done by obsession, search and books. There have always been exceptions to the rule in the world. After all, Bolotov also does not have a special medical and biochemical education, but he will give odds to any specialist in this field. As time has shown, this path can also be effective. In 2009 I was awarded the medal named after
O.O. Bogomolets, for the introduction of alternative technologies in the field of medicine. In Ukraine, this is a significant academic award in the field of medicine. Over the past ten years since its inception, only eighteen people have been awarded it. In fact, this is an official recognition of Bolotov’s views from the perspective of my many years of practice.
26. What was the determining factor for the study of medicine?
There are a number of reasons for this. For many years, I have observed health problems in different people, which were not solved in any way, and often aggravated, after they went to different clinics and research institutes. As a result, the understanding came that health requires special knowledge for self-control and the choice of a certain lifestyle. Moreover, at the end of the eighties, few people understood what the industrial tomorrow was fraught with in the post-Chernobyl period. Therefore, naturally there was a fear for myself and people close to me. But there were other reasons as well. At that time, I was looking for mathematical patterns in the construction of biological systems. Being the author of the theory of axial interconnection in numerical systems, within the framework of elementary number theory, I was looking for the presence of this regularity in integer systems of protein nature. Comparison and systematization intersected with issues of biochemistry and pharmacognosy.
And it is natural that all these layers have led to such a unity of interests. It is possible that there are also tribal relationships, since my grandfather and great-grandfather were foresters and healers, and from childhood I was immersed in this atmosphere.
27. And who do you consider yourself to be, a healer, healer or doctor?
When I began to show interest in medicine, Boris Vasilievich Bolotov warned me against focusing too much only on questions of medical practice and studying the effect of active substances on our body. He argued that the medicine of the future will be built on the basis of field and wave communication, between the modulated space and the internal matrix of each person. That the participation of any substance in the reactions of our body can be shifting, but not always determining the process of cellular transformation. That there are a lot of questions in a purely scientific plane, the answer to which will determine how quickly medical science is integrated into other areas. Therefore, my practice is aimed at clarifying the definition – irreversible processes, as well as an expanded understanding and search for mechanisms of influence on the homeostasis of our body, including those that underlie protein topology.
Based on all this, I consider myself a practicing researcher of the problems of longevity and the regenerative potential of our body.
28. If your methods work, why aren’t they used in medicine?
In 2006, I worked with a small group of biochemists and physicians who were analyzing the effect of the method on cancer patients. A group of ten people at different stages of the disease was selected. My methods only supplemented the generally accepted practice in cancer centers. The observation lasted two years. The overall summary of treatment outcomes was predictable. Doctors rated the method as cumbersome and did not allow covering a large number of patients. The use of Bolotovsky enzymes was considered inappropriate, since they are difficult to prepare in bulk and they have a short shelf life.
And the biochemists said that there is material for thought, but laboratory studies on animals are needed in order to assert something. Of the group of selected patients, in two cases the result was very good, but the oncologists wrote it off due to well-administered chemotherapy. I did not argue with anyone and did not convince anyone, realizingthat doctors are looking for a pipeline for an endless stream of cancer patients, and biochemists for a reasoned theory, for funding and future doctoral dissertations. It takes time for medical science to understand what Bolotov is talking about.
And he’s talking about astrophysical patterns that don’t fit well into a cage with rats yet. And in general, I often recall a philosophical aphorism – there is no prophet in his own country.
29. Do you associate with people who treat with herbs or use other alternative therapies?
There was a time when I was actively getting to know everyone in the hope of learning from their experiences. They were people of different levels of knowledge and training, from a variety of places. Most of them were not inclined to talk about their knowledge. Of those who revealed their achievements and secrets, these are mostly disappearing village healers, whose recipes are sometimes simply phenomenal.
But there are almost no such grandparents anymore. About 30-40 years ago there were much more of them, mainly in the north of Ukraine and in Belarus, especially where there were settlements of the Old Believers. Residents of the taiga regions of Russia also have rich experience. If we talk about alternative medicine, then basically these are attempts by doctors to find additional and less often new methods of treatment, within the dimensions of the official protocol.
But, unfortunately, the vast majority of them fall into the thoughtless imposition of the products of network companies on the sick.
30. Do you use biologically active additives (BAA) and if so, which ones?
Among the abundance of products classified as dietary supplements, there are a number of substances that can be used in a general setting. Sometimes I use some sorbents, polysaccharides, substances containing trace elements, sulfate salts, bee products and various toxic substances, from aconite to amygdalin. But with complex disorders in the body, all these substances can only be used as auxiliary. The protest against dietary supplements that has formed in society is mainly associated with the importunity and illiteracy of network marketing merchants, who, like gypsies, try to foist something on a passerby, waving skillfully composed texts.
31. Why do you think there has been a noticeable outbreak of cancer in recent years?
This is a defining and global mindset for future generations.
Bolotov named his basic book Human Health in an Unhealthy World. This is an absolutely correct diagnosis of modern society, in relation to the concept of health. The leap in scientific and technological progress has radically changed our way of life, compared to our great-great-grandfathers. Our organisms are a genetic succession that has evolved over centuries. Past generations differed from us in physical activity, principles of nutrition and quality of products. If we add to this the changed external environment and the abundance of substances that food manufacturers and pharmacists stuff us with, then these are the main reasons that have put us in front of the need for a new adaptation segment. Yes! Future generations will learn to eat slop stuffed with nitrates, preservatives, dyes, antibiotics and other carcinogens. But it is not known how much time and lives will be spent on this adaptation. We were the first to be at the forefront of these changes in the 20th and 21st century. Previous generations ate different foods and used different technologies for preserving and preparing them. This did not solve the problem of morbidity in general, but did not contribute to the development of tumor diseases. Back then, people mostly got sick from colds, infections, peroxidation, genetic defects, and poorly developed surgery.
Developed countries were the first to face the problem of tumor diseases. But the only thing they could do was to create a system for the early detection of these diseases, without the ability to cope with them. The inability of science to solve this problem loosened the tongues of the moralists who took it upon themselves to solve it. Even doctors repeat their nonsense, claiming that diseases are a direct continuation of our thoughts. I am for people to become kinder, at least in their manifestations, but I am against another ideological whip, which again threatens with punishment, but this time in the form of diseases. Not bad thoughts lead to diseases, but excessive nervousness and constant psychological stress of a modern person, in combination with other reasons. I’m asking a question. What kind of bad thoughts were in the head of small children, which overwhelmed cancer centers? Or how will a sweet lady help her good thoughts, after double coffee five times a day with a cigarette for a snack, or a creme brul with whipped cream every day? One propagandist of such views answered these questions to me like this: children get sick already in the womb, from the sinful thoughts of their mother, and a lady does not get sick from coffee and wrongly.food, but from bad thoughts about your girlfriends and neighbors. Well, this is the complete Middle Ages in the 21st century. Since civilization will not live before, this is clear to everyone. But it is necessary to minimize the losses from connection with the past. And the easiest, most correct and fastest way to do this is in nutrition, since it is closest to metabolic processes.
32. In recent years, only talk about proper nutrition and the right products. You can get confused by these diets and tips. What do you think about this?
The first rule of a healthy diet is to avoid overeating, especially in the evening.
As a wise man once said, “We dig our own grave with a fork and spoon.” Our body has different buffer systems, including the digestive system. Various secretory substances cannot be released in immense quantities. For example, pepsinogen, which is a pro-enzyme of pepsin, is produced by the chief cells of the fundic glands of the stomach up to a certain critical mass. This is determined not only by the mass of the main cells of the stomach and the activity of the hormone gastrin, but also by the neuroimpulse that activates the parietal cells of the stomach, which secrete hydrochloric acid. As soon as our brain has received information about food, in the form of taste buds or smell, it makes a test analysis of the product in hundredths of a second and activates one or another isoform of pepsinogen after saliva is released. Today, 8 types of pepsinogen belonging to groups have been identified – A (PG I – 5), B (PG II – 2), C (PG III – 1). All of them differ in molecular weight and electrophoretic mobility. Research at Pittsburgh Medical University has shown that when different foods are consumed, the combination of pepsinogen isoforms and their electrophoretic mobility are invariant. This is due to the work of the brain, which not only analyzes the biochemical composition of the product, but also selects the optimal combination for its absorption. But the most interesting thing is that the invariants depend on the type of products and their simultaneous presence in the mouth. It turns out that when using different products, the spectrum of invariants increases due to topological and wave differences. At the same time, the chain of 44 additional amino acids is unchanged in all 8 species. But if the products are mixed, then there are only four invariants. Additional ones appear only with the addition of products that have undergone different types of fermentation. From this we can conclude that the principles of consistent nutrition, when we can eat foods one after another without mixing them, are more correct for our body. And the body breaks down and absorbs multicomponent dishes poorly. It was nice to know that the products that have gone through fermentation are accepted by our body even with a multi-component overload. I gave an example only on the work of the buffer system of the stomach, which is controlled by our brain. And similar buffer mechanisms exist in other systems and organs related to digestion.
Think about what happens when we force the body with overeating. But in addition to the biochemical features in the work of our body, there are also biophysical ones. And this is not only the condition of the spine, which plays an important bioenergetic role. Today it is well known that our body is subject to daily rhythms associated with sunrise and sunset. From about 4 to 5 o’clock in the morning, he begins to wake up, gaining hormonal and secretory activity. And from 16 to 18 hours, he begins to fall asleep, lowering his activity. Already by 20 o’clock the secrets of the digestive organs are inactive, and the body is not able to fully process food until the morning comes. Therefore, the intake of animal food should be completed by 17 o’clock, and vegetable food by 20 o’clock. But the body can be restarted if you get some sleep during the day.
Tell me, who eats and rests like this in today’s world? But this is only part of the problem of proper nutrition for a healthy person. And if there are already violations, then there will be more and more rules. Other examples from the field of psychology can be cited. All valves in the digestive system are neuromuscular. With increased nervous excitability, fear, physical overload and for other reasons, their spasms occur. If, for example, for any reason, a valve spasm occurs between the stomach and the duodenum, then bile is thrown into the stomach, followed by a violation of all digestion and, as a result, metabolic processes. That is why in Bolotov’s medicine the procedure for swallowing cakes occupies an important place before you start eating right. And then the principles of proper nutrition begin to work. And here Dr. Naumov absolutely correctly says: “The patient should not be treated, but properly fed.” You can talk a lot about this, but the conclusion will always be the same – the vast majority of people have no idea about proper nutrition, and in the end about a proper and safe lifestyle.
33. What foods do you consider the most dangerous for our health?
This is information for a large article. Therefore, Iit is only a few myths that are repeated by nutritionists like a prayer. We often hear that salt is white death. But those who repeat this nonsense do not know that salt (NaCl) is the only known product from which our body is able to extract chlorine (Cl) to produce hydrogen chloride (HCl), which is the basic substance of gastric juice. The body produces from 6 to 8 liters of gastric juice, which is spent on the digestion of food in a total volume of 0.7 – 0.9 liters. The rest of the gastric juice is distributed throughout the body, performing complex cleansing functions, dissolving old cells and blocking infections. Medicine and dietetics say that salt is harmful due to its sodium (Na) content, which negatively affects the functioning of the heart and kidneys.
But when a person is already sick and serious, it’s hard to say what doesn’t affect him.
Salt is the only source of sodium in the body. And it is necessary, as it participates in the process of transferring substances into and out of each cell. Participates in the generation of nerve impulses and muscle contractions. And it is probably no coincidence that our body has a complex system for regulating water balance, where sodium acts as a tap, turning water on and off. We constantly hear from people that the less salt they consume, the greater the chance to protect themselves from osteochondrosis, arthritis, gout and other similar diseases. But this is an absolutely wrong understanding, since completely different salts (urates, phosphates, oxalates) are deposited in the body, which are formed as a result of unnecessary neutralization reactions between acidic and alkaline substances in our body.
Another powerful stereotype is the myth about the benefits of vegetable oils, which are polyunsaturated fats (PUF), and are absorbed by the digestive system without load. But the main thing that nutrition and medicine are fighting for is vitamin E (tocopherol) contained in vegetable oils, which is a powerful antioxidant in the fight against free radicals and problems of cardiovascular disease. But at the same time, none of the advisers says that the daily norm of PNS is only 3-5 grams. Our lymph is formed in the process of complex biochemical transformations. But despite its alkaline reaction, it is a fatty, salty brine, in which animal fats make up 83%, and vegetable fats 17%. If you regularly use nuts, almonds, peanuts, seeds, olives and black olives, then the body will always be replenished with the amount of vitamin E it needs. especially in the lymphatic, endocrine, reproductive system and intestines. This is especially facilitated by vegetable oil emulsifiers in the form of margarine and mayonnaise, which stimulate diseases such as melanoma, liposarcoma, lymphoma, leukemia and lymphogranulomatosis. If you open a chemistry textbook for grade 9, then we will read that any vegetable oil heated to a boil is converted into drying oil. Therefore, it is better for her to paint fences and dissolve paint than to eat. Of course, you should not completely exclude the use of vegetable oils. But it is better to use them in an unrefined form, without fanaticism and with the obligatory addition of vinegars or balsamics. But you can’t mix it with animal fats and heat it. And vice versa, the use of a small amount of fat, 1/4 – 1/3 of a matchbox per day for 70-80 kg. weight, contributes to filling the body with the fat it needs and the formation of normal fatty lymph homeostasis. But fatty meat, and meat in general, is not the highest quality product, since its fats form very low density lipoproteins, known as bad cholesterol. By eating meat, we fight for only 3-4 essential amino acids, which, for example, in sea fish, are a complete set necessary for the body. Fish is the only product on earth that is an ideal carrier of all the necessary amino acids for the normal construction of our cells.
In our time, especially among women, the idea of vegetarianism has become popular. But in plant foods there are no essential amino acids we need, without which the body has no chance to build normal, healthy cells. Therefore, it is necessary to consume sea fish, predatory river and lake fish, other seafood, eggs, cheeses and a group of dairy products. Vegetables are best sour, or consumed with sour cream or natural vinegar.
I recommend everyone to memorize Dmitry Vlasovich Naumov’s book on proper nutrition – “Life without pills – it’s easy to be healthy”, in which he unfolds the problem of malnutrition and explains how to eat right. Knowing in advance about its content, I think that it will be enough for a school textbook, for lessons on health safety.
34. Some experts suggest acidification of the body, while others suggest alkalization. So which one is right?
The vast majority of people always choose between two extremes on the basis of their own – someone else’s, useful – harmful, best – worst. This is due to the fact that the human brain has an emotional, binocular dependence on the visual function, which is the most emotional guide in a person. Therefore, a person is always looking for the absolute, the truth. But the world is not arranged like that, it is integral. Therefore, the dynamics of the set of binocular choices of the brain, allows you to see the world integrally. This is called matrix thinking. Our body is exactly the same. It is a collection of kaleidoscopic changes that occur every fraction of a second, at a rate of 6,000,000,000 reactions per second. Every second, 5,000,000 cells are born and die in the body. This is a nuclear boiler operating in the mode of balance of opposite components – anabolism and catabolism. The whole world is built in between extremes. There is basic knowledge and understanding of the processes. For example, at a certain stage in the development of nuclear chemistry, Mendeleev identified about 100 elements in his table.
After 135 years, Boris Vasilyevich Bolotov decided to find out what lies between the extremes in the form of chemical elements. And he discovered a colossal number of isosteres between the chemical elements of the periodic table. They turned out to be more than 1000 invariants. This is an example of the balance of matrix thinking between two extremes.
In a healthy body, there must be a balance of environments, what is called acid-base balance. These media are distributed in different but dependent systems, such as liver secretions and gastric secretions. Diseases arise both on the basis of overoxidation and on the basis of overalkalinization. Therefore, it is important to understand at what shifts the disease occurs in order to choose the right method for the formation of the environment and the selection of substances. And at the final stages of treatment, after the shift stages, it is always necessary to simulate the acid-base balance and try to maintain it. If this is not done, then the diseases will not lag behind.
35. What diseases, from your point of view, develop into oncological ones?
I have already said that the determining factor in the development of tumor processes and, as a result, oncological diseases, is the alkaline status of the body, when proteins are assembled on the amine group. This is due to a violation of isomerization reactions, when the body is no longer able to convert plant D – isomeric molecules into aliphatic and L – isomeric forms.
If this process is present, then it makes no sense to classify any diseases that develop into oncology. The very phenomenon of photosynthesis in the body will create a guide for the future oncological process. The only thing you need to pay attention to is the factors accelerating the process of developing cancer. First of all, these are violations in the work of the digestive system and various infections present in the body, from viruses to helminthic invasions. I believe that cancerous diseases are not genetically transmitted, but only prolong on weakened organs and systems, only if the acid-base balance is disturbed and the process of photosynthesis is present in the body. The predominant predisposition to these processes are hypotonic homeostasis disorders.
36. Do you plan to write books, or somehow voice the prevention of cancer?
I don’t plan to do this, because I profess the rule not to promote anything totally, try to answer only the questions asked and tell people only what they are able to perceive at the moment. I don’t want to waste time on persuasion, since most people have a hard time parting with their beliefs, beliefs, stereotypes and way of life. Educational vaccinations work best not in texts, from which today one can build skyscrapers, but in illustrative examples on specific patients. Yes, and Boris Vasilievich Bolotov has already written a lot of books, which are enough for everyone.
37. When do you think modern medicine will cure all cancer patients?
Unfortunately, this is not only a question of medical science, but also of those who have already planned and behind the scenes are implementing the global project of the society of the future. This topic lies beyond the limits of diseases, in the field of the philosophy of power and the principles of the expediency of the development of civilization. If an effective and 100% cure for cancer appears, then the pharmaceutical companies will turn it not into a medicine, but into a remedy for death. One can only guess how much it will cost if today, for example, an American course for the treatment of hepatitis C costs $15,000, and cyberknife surgery in Kyiv costs $15,000 and more. Today they write a lot about the price policy in medicine, and there are even points of view of famous people that in the situationoverpopulation, this is how natural market selection is made, incapable of the price level of future technological proposals and social standards. When I think about it, knowing about the role of billionaire families in this, I always remember a line from one cowboy movie – “Bolevar can’t stand two”
